Home » A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world

by GOTOmusic



ब्रिलियंट की प्रीमियम सदस्यता पर 20% की छूट पाएं – जीवन भर के लिए! 1989 में इस घोषणा के साथ कोल्ड फ्यूज़न विस्फोट के दृश्य पर साइन अप करें कि शोधकर्ताओं फ्लेशमैन और पोंस ने एक रासायनिक प्रक्रिया के माध्यम से ऊर्जा बनाई थी जो कमरे के तापमान पर संलयन को प्रेरित करती है। जब कोई और अपने निष्कर्षों को दोहराने में सक्षम नहीं था, तो शीत संलयन दशकों में सबसे बड़ी विज्ञान विफलताओं में से एक के रूप में नीचे चला गया। लेकिन कुछ का मानना ​​है कि वे सही रास्ते पर थे, और उनका तरीका दुनिया को बदलने की कुंजी हो सकता है। लेख और वीडियो के लिंक नीचे दिए गए हैं। पैट्रन पर मेरा समर्थन करें! टेस्ला पाने के इच्छुक हैं तो कूल नीरी टी-शर्ट प्राप्त करें? मेरे रेफ़रल लिंक का उपयोग करें और छूट और लाभ प्राप्त करें: एक चैनल सदस्य बनें और यहां विशेष लाइवस्ट्रीम और सामग्री तक पहुंच प्राप्त करें: मेरे सभी स्थानों पर मेरा अनुसरण करें! इंस्टाग्राम: स्नैपचैट: फेसबुक: ट्विटर: लिंक लिंक: मिनटफिजिक्स – मुऑन-कैटालिज्ड फ्यूजन एनिमेशन का उत्कृष्ट ब्रेकडाउन जाली-सक्षम कोल्ड फ्यूजन विधि दिखा रहा है: एक प्रो-एलईएनआर वीडियो: एलईएनआर शोध अध्ययनों का एक संग्रह:।

Images related to the topic a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

Search related to the topic A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

#Technology #Change #World #Exists #Answers #Joe
A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe
a technology that would change the world
आप यहां बहुत सारी उपयोगी जानकारी देख सकते हैं: यहाँ और देखें
आप यहां बहुत सारी उपयोगी जानकारी देख सकते हैं: यहाँ और देखें

You may also like

22 comments

Ryan Katic 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Everything worth exploring. so long as you accept that failure is totally an option

Reply
Duchess 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Science is the modern worlds religion. and its priests are just as closed minded and arrogant.

Reply
SolarWinds AuroraBorealis 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Hey Joe, thanks for all the eye opening vids. Question, do you make your living on YouTube or do you have a profession other than Answers with Joe? We'd be curious to know. Thanks!

Reply
Jason J 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

its sad that the scientific community would just give up on it bc 2 ppl are assholes. bummer. you never know.

Reply
King Nekogon 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

"Junk science or worth exploring?"
Focus on making Muons easier (cheaper) to make, or prevent them from sticking. Yeet the lattice bs out the window.

Reply
Christopher Caldwell 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Imagine trying to explain something like GPS (which depends on the speed of light) to someone who thought Newton's Laws were "the final answer".

What it comes down to is "have you done the work?" If somebody comes to you with this really cool theory/idea AND can show you how they got there, all power to them.

It's really hard for me to declare that cold fusion is impossible with particles apparently going back and forth in time… but I'd want to see the chain of events leading up such an extraordinary claim.

Reply
Robert Deskins 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Just remember archeology is NOT science the same way chemistry & physics is

Reply
LordPadriac 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

NASA won't touch emdrive no matter how promising it could be they're too regimented to take actual scientific risks anymore. Maybe it's a pipe dream but it's something that can only be tested in space. I think if someone with their very own private space fleet were to launch a study into and it played out…forget about going to see little green men or settling colonies – there's still too much other work that needs to be done like some way to mimic gravity. If the emdrive was tested and it worked and was perfected; whatever company did that would own energy and be the ONLY name in clean energy from that point on. If you have an engine that takes no power but generates movement then you have a way to spin a dynamo and beam that energy via laser or microwave back to Earth for use.

Reply
0x777 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Cold fusion is about 20 years out.

Granted, it has been 20 years out for about half a century…

Reply
John Guerra 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”
― Socrates

Reply
Arash Arfaee 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

I can see one exception to your thinking ways. There are people that although they might not realize it, it is their jobs to force themselves to think differently. Scientists themselves or at leat those who do something big, usually start from not accepting things as is.
But in general, I agree with you. I can have the luxury of doubting everything around my own speciality, but I trust the rest to what majority of scientists can agree on them. Which Btw, at best 30% somewhat accurate and in time most of them will be discredited or replaced with a new version that many time is an improved version of the old views. I don't see a way to do better than this while one keeps studying and thinking and growing that might lead to some wisdom seeing things a bit better starting seeing things. And get back to the right side of the DK graph in a different level! 🤔

Reply
Whine 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

What most people don't know is that a Cold Fusion machine was invented, but it was stolen by the infamous PAYDAY gang for a certain right-leaning senator backed by a large oil conglomerate.

Reply
Vinny Lamoureux 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

It's worth the risk cuz the people who do it are so wedded to whatever it is that they might go ok nuts otherwise.

Reply
Stoney's Dead 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

I think skepticism can lead to cynicism and that's what we need to avoid. But as long as your skepticism is applied appropriately so that it doesn't squash creativity and thinking out of the box- it's a good thing I think. The w ay I look at it there's no way you can study it all- at some point if you're going to be educated and informed you have to take someone's word for it. At least when it comes to science I know and understand the means by which they arrived at their opinions- the scientific method. In reality I'm trusting that method- not them or their authority. This is why I feel it's super important that we hold these ppl accountable to following that method always- never deviating or letting bias skew the outcome any more than what's absolutely unavoidable. This means policing the way papers are published, the way labs operate, how experiments are carried out, etc. Because like any other institution science is not immune to the almighty influence of the dollar.

Reply
Ed Reusser 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

I wish you would have talked more about the lack of neutrons and the lack of other evidence that fusion took place. And yes I believe that this should be pursued. The fact that it works so well with muons means that the amount of energy required is in the same magnitude as that required. It may be possible to modify the substrate to get better results.

Reply
pedro pedrohan 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

8:22 i thought it was the other 1989

Reply
MoneyMakerUDV 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

And now, 2 years later, we are pretty close to implement this, at least progress is huge

Reply
Masternuckable 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Fusion is at 97-98% efficiency at this point. Uber exciting!

Reply
Martin Samuelian 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Joe, what about Max Planck's believes on consciousness? ps: you are very good at what you do. Well done

Reply
Joseph Stokes 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

GRAMMAR! _ Joe, I'm back! One cannot have something "between" three people! It is "among" when there are more than two!! Come on, this is sixth grade grammar!!

Reply
Christopher Zenga 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

Can you cut the opening to this and reupload for today’s world?

Reply
Jiminy Cricket 04/12/2021 - 9:46 Chiều

@2:14 – Had to see if this was a 2021 statement lol.

Reply

Leave a Comment